Reference

1 Kings 16:12

Thus did Zimri destroy all the house of Baasha, according to the word of the Lord, which he spake against Baasha by Jehu the prophet,
10

And Zimri went in and smote him, and killed him, in the twenty and seventh year of Asa king of Judah, and reigned in his stead.

11

And it came to pass, when he began to reign, as soon as he sat on his throne, that he slew all the house of Baasha: he left him not one that pisseth against a wall, neither of his kinsfolks, nor of his friends.

12

Thus did Zimri destroy all the house of Baasha, according to the word of the Lord, which he spake against Baasha by Jehu the prophet,

13

For all the sins of Baasha, and the sins of Elah his son, by which they sinned, and by which they made Israel to sin, in provoking the Lord God of Israel to anger with their vanities.

14

Now the rest of the acts of Elah, and all that he did, are they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel?

Why This Verse Was Tagged

Destruction / Perishing Language
Keyword Match
100% relevance

This verse contains specific terms directly associated with this theme.

Literal Fulfillment
Keyword Match
90% relevance

This verse contains specific terms directly associated with this theme.

Agency Representation
Keyword Match
80% relevance

This verse contains specific terms directly associated with this theme.

Counter-Arguments

The strongest case that this verse does not belong in this theme.

Destruction / Perishing Language

This verse explicitly states that Zimri "destroy[ed] all the house of Baasha," directly using the word "destroy" in relation to the fate of a wicked house, which aligns perfectly with the theme definition.

Literal Fulfillment

While the verse describes a literal event, the "word of the Lord" could be interpreted as a general divine decree or consequence rather than a specific, detailed prophecy that was fulfilled in every minute detail.

Agency Representation

The verse explicitly states that Zimri's actions were "according to the word of the Lord, which he spake against Baasha by Jehu the prophet." This phrasing directly attributes the origin of the "word" to the Lord and identifies Jehu as the *means* by which that word was delivered. While ancient Near Eastern agency conventions are a valid lens for understanding prophetic speech, the verse itself doesn't merely imply agency; it directly states the source and the messenger. The strongest argument a