Reference

Colossians 2:16

Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath days:
14

Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross;

15

And having spoiled principalities and powers, he made a shew of them openly, triumphing over them in it.

16

Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath days:

17

Which are a shadow of things to come; but the body is of Christ.

18

Let no man beguile you of your reward in a voluntary humility and worshipping of angels, intruding into those things which he hath not seen, vainly puffed up by his fleshly mind,

Why This Verse Was Tagged

Sabbath Fulfilled or Changed
Keyword Match
80% relevance

This verse contains specific terms directly associated with this theme.

Dietary Laws Fulfilled / Abolished
Keyword Match
90% relevance

This verse contains specific terms directly associated with this theme.

Counter-Arguments

The strongest case that this verse does not belong in this theme.

Sabbath Fulfilled or Changed

The verse instructs against being judged for observing or not observing the Sabbath, but it does not explicitly state that the Sabbath itself is fulfilled or changed, only that judgment regarding its observance is inappropriate.

Seventh-Day Sabbath

The verse lists "sabbath days" as one item among several (meat, drink, holyday, new moon) in which believers should not be judged. It does not explicitly reference the seventh day as *the* Sabbath or a rest day, nor does it affirm its continued observance.

Dietary Laws Fulfilled / Abolished

The verse does not explicitly state that dietary laws are "abolished" or that "all foods are clean." It focuses on the *judgment* of others regarding these practices, implying that the believer's standing before God is not contingent on adherence to these specific observances. While this strongly suggests a diminished binding nature, it doesn't use the language of outright abolition or universal cleanness for all foods. Some interpretations might argue it refers to ceremonial aspects rather than