Reference

Ezekiel 20:13

But the house of Israel rebelled against me in the wilderness: they walked not in my statutes, and they despised my judgments, which if a man do, he shall even live in them; and my sabbaths they greatly polluted: then I said, I would pour out my fury upon them in the wilderness, to consume them.
11

And I gave them my statutes, and shewed them my judgments, which if a man do, he shall even live in them.

12

Moreover also I gave them my sabbaths, to be a sign between me and them, that they might know that I am the Lord that sanctify them.

13

But the house of Israel rebelled against me in the wilderness: they walked not in my statutes, and they despised my judgments, which if a man do, he shall even live in them; and my sabbaths they greatly polluted: then I said, I would pour out my fury upon them in the wilderness, to consume them.

14

But I wrought for my name’s sake, that it should not be polluted before the heathen, in whose sight I brought them out.

15

Yet also I lifted up my hand unto them in the wilderness, that I would not bring them into the land which I had given them, flowing with milk and honey, which is the glory of all lands;

Why This Verse Was Tagged

Israel as Distinct
Keyword Match
80% relevance

This verse contains specific terms directly associated with this theme.

Destruction / Perishing Language
Keyword Match
100% relevance

This verse contains specific terms directly associated with this theme.

Counter-Arguments

The strongest case that this verse does not belong in this theme.

Seventh-Day Sabbath

The verse mentions "my sabbaths" in the plural, indicating multiple sabbaths or the general concept of sabbath observance, rather than specifically referencing the seventh day as *the* Sabbath or rest day. Therefore, it does not explicitly support the theme of the "Seventh-Day Sabbath."

Israel as Distinct

The verse describes Israel's rebellion and God's threatened judgment, which is a common theme in the Old Testament and doesn't inherently define Israel's distinctness from the Church. While it speaks of Israel as a distinct entity in that historical context, it doesn't preclude a theological understanding where the Church is seen as the spiritual continuation or fulfillment of Israel's promises, or that the "distinctness" is primarily historical rather than eschatological.

Destruction / Perishing Language

There is no counter-argument as the verse explicitly states God's intention to "pour out my fury upon them in the wilderness, to consume them," which directly aligns with the theme of "Destruction / Perishing Language."

Israel-Specific Promises

The verse describes Israel's rebellion and God's threatened judgment, which is a consequence of their actions, not a promise, prophecy, or covenant directed at them in a positive or future-oriented sense. While it is specific to Israel, it doesn't fit the "promises, prophecies, or covenants" aspect of the definition.