Reference

Matthew 9:17

Neither do men put new wine into old bottles: else the bottles break, and the wine runneth out, and the bottles perish: but they put new wine into new bottles, and both are preserved.
15

And Jesus said unto them, Can the children of the bridechamber mourn, as long as the bridegroom is with them? but the days will come, when the bridegroom shall be taken from them, and then shall they fast.

16

No man putteth a piece of new cloth unto an old garment, for that which is put in to fill it up taketh from the garment, and the rent is made worse.

17

Neither do men put new wine into old bottles: else the bottles break, and the wine runneth out, and the bottles perish: but they put new wine into new bottles, and both are preserved.

18

While he spake these things unto them, behold, there came a certain ruler, and worshipped him, saying, My daughter is even now dead: but come and lay thy hand upon her, and she shall live.

19

And Jesus arose, and followed him, and so did his disciples.

Counter-Arguments

The strongest case that this verse does not belong in this theme.

Annihilation / Destruction

The verse uses "perish" in the context of containers (bottles) failing to hold their contents, not in the context of the wicked being destroyed as a result of judgment. The primary focus is on the incompatibility of new wine with old wineskins, leading to the destruction of the wineskins, not the destruction of sentient beings.

Destruction / Perishing Language

The verse uses "perish" in reference to "bottles" (wineskins), not to the "wicked." The context is an analogy about the incompatibility of new teachings with old traditions, not a statement about the fate of people.

Symbolic / Non-Fermented Wine

The verse explicitly states "new wine" and "old bottles." The analogy relies on the fermentation process of new wine, which would expand and burst old, inflexible wineskins. If the "new wine" were unfermented grape juice, it would not pose the same risk to old wineskins, thus undermining the core message of the parable. The symbolism is about the incompatibility of the new teaching (new wine) with old traditions (old wineskins), and this incompatibility is best understood in the context of ferme

Total Abstinence

This verse uses wine as a metaphor for teachings or practices, not as a literal substance to be avoided. It discusses the incompatibility of new and old systems, not the consumption of alcohol itself.

Wine vs Strong Drink Distinction

The verse exclusively uses the term "wine" (οἶνος) and makes no mention of "strong drink" or any other alcoholic beverage. Therefore, it provides no basis for distinguishing between wine and strong drink.